Attorney-client privilege is the right of clients to refuse to disclose confidential communications with their lawyers to third parties. This privilege is fundamental to preserve the right to effective legal counsel. Lawyers cannot function effectively on behalf of their clients without the ability to communicate with them in confidence.

With that said, as an appellate attorney, I was successful in overturning a trial court’s decision denying a protective order—preventing the disclosure of attorney client communication.[1] In a case, where a son was suing his mother, we filed a Writ of Certiorari on a discovery issue—a litigation process during which each party requests relevant information and documents from the other side in an attempt to “discover” pertinent facts. The information the son was seeking from the mother, I believed to be attorney-client privilege.

By filing for a Writ of Certiorari, often referred to as a Writ of Cert, I swiftly completed a petition explaining to the appellate court the reasoning that the trial court’s interlocutory order needed to be reversed. After evaluating the petition the appellate court decides whether or not to grant a show cause order to the opposing party. If the court issues a show cause order the opposing party answers the petition. In this particular case the court issued a show cause order and the reply was submitted by the opposing parties’ council.

In less than two months the appellate agreed with our position and the Writ of Cert I filed was granted; and the trial courts decision denying the protective order was overturned. Had we not petitioned the appellate court with the Writ of Cert, the opposing party would have access to privileged information. Thus, I was able to prevent letting the proverbial cat out of the bag.

Robin Bresky, Law Offices of Robin Bresky

[1] A large part of my practice is drafting pre-trial litigation as well as appellate briefs. Please note, in the case stated above, I was hired as a ghostwriter for another attorney who sought my services, because of my extensive knowledge on appellate law. In addition to my own clients, I offer litigation support to other attorneys that seek my expertise.

One of the most prominent disputes amongst divorcing couples is the division or disposal of the marital home. And, due to the current economic conditions, homes have been almost impossible to sell and many have fallen into foreclosure. A status most would try to avoid; but may not always be the case when resentful behavior plays a factor, and when we act on emotion instead of sound judgment.

After a long term marriage and subsequent divorce, a trial court had awarded title, for purposes of selling a multimillion dollar home, to the former wife. The house had gone into foreclosure during the divorce proceeding, but the former wife had a buyer for the home. The ex-husband appealed the house being put in the wife’s name. He had a right to appeal as the order concerned entitlement to property. Although the former wife had a buyer for the marital home, the former husband was willing to loose the house to foreclosure rather than sell it and divide its worth. The ex- wife could not get a title company to give clear title, based on the pending appeal. Moreover, the buyer she had, pursuant to their contract, was able to walk away from the deal, if clear title was not obtained, after a certain date.

Typically, the appeals process can be lengthy, sometimes lasting even years. Transcripts of the proceeding below must be ordered and presented to the appellate court, all sides must prepare and submit briefs, once the briefing process is completed, and it’s reviewed by a three- judge panel. Understanding the importance of time, our firm successfully motioned the appellate court to expedite the appeal on behalf of the former wife. In a little less than two months a decision was rendered. We had won the appeal and received a per curium affirmance, which means the appellate court upheld the trial court’s order. The house will not be lost to foreclosure and the closing is now set to go forward.

My job as an appellate attorney is to be knowledgeable in black-letter law, the appeals process and in writing effective appellate briefs; and concisely explaining why the appellate court judges should or should not affirm the circuit court’s decision. Seeking my expertise, as an appellate attorney, allowed for the former wife to silence her ex-husband’s attempt to be spiteful and prevented foreclosure of the marital home.
Robin Bresky, Law Offices of Robin Bresky